Facts and Statistics For a Factual Argumentative Essay

Facts and Statistics For a Factual Argumentative EssayWith these facts and statistics for a factual argumentative essay, you can surely get your point across with ease. This is especially so when you are writing an essay on a controversial issue, one that can drive an audience mad or simply confuse them. Here are five facts and statistics for a factual argumentative essay that you might find useful in your quest to make an essay clear and well-researched.It might not be the topic of a factual argumentative essay that you should focus on but the authors who wrote the essay. More often than not, the facts or statistics in a particular piece of writing are compiled from opinions, or the author's own personal experience, combined with observations by others, and educated guesses and assumptions. Sometimes, these come from people who are not even the subject of the piece, but people who are more than likely to take a stand on the topic, such as the writer's close friends or relatives. The 'facts' you use in your piece should conform to the opinions of these experts. This is particularly so if the facts you use can be verified and supported by others.While this may sound obvious, it is important to remember when you are writing a factual argumentative essay that many people might disagree about the subject matter. However, the fact is that the more people who agree that a particular piece of writing is not well researched or well-researched, the less likely they are to think it is good writing. Hence, if you have an opinion that you think is not supported by facts, you should back that up with evidence that will show other people that your opinion is factually correct. An example of this would be to include quotes from scientists who support your opinion, rather than the typical examples of scientific experts. The key here is to give people a choice: they have the option of choosing whether to believe you, and support your opinion, or not.In addition to providing quo tes and evidence supporting your argument, you should also back up your topics with facts that you can use to prove that your facts are indeed true. This way, readers will be able to see that you have backed up your facts with valid arguments. However, you should make sure you do not over-inflate your claims. Do not make your case seem as though it is so far-fetched that there is no way you could have possibly made it up. On the contrary, if possible, back up your factual arguments with examples that can be used to show other people how a claim has been proven.When writing a factual argumentative essay, you should also use statistics. These provide you with data that you can use to support your claims. Statistics allow you to compare and contrast the differences between two, or more, points of view, and thus show how one might have been. Just like quotes, statistics can be used to support your opinions or demonstrate their validity.Finally, you should know that writing a factual arg umentative essay requires balance. You should also take into account the nature of the argument you are making. For instance, if you are arguing against gender discrimination, you might need to include statements that support the idea that women are discriminated against. This can be done using statistics or by focusing on statistics and calling attention to how they demonstrate that women are discriminated against.Writing a factual argumentative essay does not have to be difficult. Indeed, with a little effort, you can create a powerful essay that is backed up by facts and statistics, while providing a proper balance of supporting and opposing points of view.As you can see, the facts and statistics for a factual argumentative essay are not as daunting as you might have thought. The choice is yours, though, and you can choose to use either facts or statistics to back up your arguments or use both, depending on the content of your essay.

Magnetic Stimuli Essays - Magnetism, Geomagnetism,

Magnetic Stimuli The Role of Magnetic Stimuli in Animals In as early in the year 1855 Minddendorf proposed the idea of broad front, one-direction migration also suggested a means of orientation, that birds were capable of detecting the magnetic poles and of maintaining their bearing therefrom. Since then many similar ideas have continued to pop up at random intervals (Carthy 56). An immediate difficulty is the lack of any structure or tissue that could possibly react to the magnetic field. In the year 1948, the discovery of certain forces were indeed produced by placing non-magnetic material in a magnetic field, however they were far too minute to merit any serious consideration (Carthy 59). Some reports speak of heightened locomotor activity and heartbeat, when in close proximity to increased magnetic fields; a fact which might mean that a kinesis-based magnetism is a possibility. A study was done in which magnets were attached to birds and released in sunny (or starry) conditions have repeatedly been shown to have no effect on orientation (Dorst 24). However recently it has been shown that pigeons repeatedly released under conditions of heavy overcast (in areas where the recognition of landmarks could not rigorously excluded) have an orientation which is disturbed by magnets. Most workers with caged birds have failed to find any tracer of orientation in a planetarium with all the stars blocked off or in any closed room (32). This phenomenon definitely shows evidence that some if not all birds use celestial bodies. One group studying magnetic orientation in birds has consistently claimed to the contrary. Their accumulated data does seem to show some directional tendenci es but the scatter distribution is so wide that their significance could be said to be more statistical than biological. There are suggestions that there may be at least a north/south klino- or tropptaxis to the magnetic field. It must be remembered that no-one has yet been able to give the slightest indication of what the magnetic-sensitive organs are, nor whether they have sufficient acuity for us to be able to speak of a menotaxis, let alone orientation. By contrast, the birds eye is a very highly developed sense organ. Recent work suggests that European robins do not even detect north from the polarity of the magnetic field but from its angle to the horizon (43). Hypotheses that the earth magnetic field could provide a navigational grid date as far back as the work Viguier completed in 1882. The outcome of his work suggested that birds could detect and measure three components of the field, its intensity, inclination (the angle which a compass needle makes with the horizontal) and declination (the angle between magnetic and geographical north). These three components vary more or less with independence of one another so that their isolines would form a complex grid. Over the next few years, several different scientists restated this hypothesis, with minor variations. The complete lack of evidence for any direct reaction to a magnetic field in birds is a very questionable issue (Carthy 46). Can birds actually use magnetic stimuli as an internal compass? Well Casamajor (1927) and Wodzicki (1939) found that fixing magnets to the head of the Pigeon and the Stork, had no effect on their homing ability. There are many other theoretical difficulties that may provide an answer as to why the magnets did not affect the homing ability of the two animals in question (48). An important one is that measurement of declination requires an exact knowledge of geographical north. Elimination of the declination isolines from the magnetic grid reduces the plausibility of the whole scheme, since the inclination and intensity isolines generally cross one another at oblique angles making good fixes impossible (Lincoln 79). With these initial theoretical difficulties in mind the concept of direct sensitivity was therefore replaced by one of indirect sensitivity to the earths magnetic field, and the whole hypothesis was resurrected (Lincoln 89). In the year 1947, Yeagley suggested that the flying bird, which acted as a linear conductor moving through the lines of force field, could detect the earths field. Theoretically this would result in a small potential difference being set up between the two ends of the conductor, though at this time had not